EAFT has circulated to the Parliament and the Commission an important summary document setting out our vision of Europe, entitled \" A different take on Europe: the need to rebuild Europe<\/strong> \" in which \u0301over 200 of our correspondents took part including from Central and Eastern European countries, in a spirit of participatory democracy leading to concrete proposals. It was the subject of a colloquium on 1 April 2019 organised at the headquarters of the European Commission in Brussels during which AEPL also presented a report on \"the digital transition, work, employment and new solidarities\"<\/p>\n EAFT has also provided an important contribution to the citizens' consultation on the Future of Europe<\/strong>(2021-2022): nearly a hundred of our correspondents<\/strong>\u00a0sent us their contributions, which we have compiled into a three-part summary document dealing with Governance and Institutions (federation, legislative initiative by the European Parliament and strengthening of its powers, rule of law, abandoning unanimity voting; promotion and defence of our way of life, including our values, creation of a genuine European social policy and raising certain policies, such as health, to the European level), migration and asylum, and defence and security.<\/p>\n This summary was forwarded to the relevant commissioners<\/strong> : Ms Suica, Mr Schinas, Mr Breton and the President of the EP, Ms Metsola, and posted on the multilingual platform.<\/p>\n The AEPL was thus able to contribute to the final report of the Conference on the Future of Europe, whose 328 measures and 49 proposals were submitted on 9 May 2022 to the presidents of the European institutions. Having read the conference\u2019s final report, the AEPL can claim to have influenced a number of these measures.<\/p>\n EAFT is a regular partner at meetings under the Lisbon treaty's article 17 dialogue , which guarantees \"an open, transparent and regular dialogue with Churches and religious associations or communities, as well as with philosophical and non-confessional organisations\". EAFT ensures that institutions treat religious and non-confessional organisations equally,<\/strong>in particular by writing to the Presidents of the Parliament and the Commission.<\/p>\n It also contributed to the guidelines for EU diplomats vis-\u00e0-vis third countries by adding the sentence: \" the rights of non-believers, agnostics and atheists will be protected by the European Union, as will the fundamental right to change or abandon one's religion or beliefs<\/strong> \"<\/p>\n Numerous examples of direct democracy by sending emails to European and national politicians: against the display of crucifixes in Italian schools (2011: Lautsi case); campaign against the confirmation by the European Parliament of the Maltese commissioner M. Borg given his unacceptable positions on homosexuality and the right to divorce; for the right to atheism (2013: J. Mejri case in Tunisia); against authoritarian excesses (2013: J. Mejri case in Tunisia); against the authoritarian and anti-democratic excesses of Turkey, Poland and Hungary; request to limit the concessions made to the United Kingdom before the Brexit referendum; etc. Letter to High Representative Mogherini protesting against her project for an \"Erasmus of religions\", finally abandoned by her successor Josep Borrell, to whom the EU has given its support. Another letter has just been sent concerning the situation of women in Iran.<\/strong><\/p>\n Another example is the letter sent in June 2021 to Members of the European Parliament calling on them to support the\u00a0resolution on sexual and reproductive rights<\/strong> ensuring in particular safe and legal access to abortion,<\/strong> EAFT believes that it is important to further promote the right of every individual to exercise total control over matters relating to their sexuality.<\/strong><\/p>\n This action led to a complaint being lodged with the European Ombudsman, Ms O\u2019Reilly, in 2012 against Mr Barroso, then President of the European Commission, on the grounds of his unduly religious appointments of members to the European Group on Ethics in Science and Technology. Indeed, of the 15 university professors on the group, he had appointed seven theologians, including a consecrated virgin. To top it all off, he had also appointed an Italian professor, Ms Laura Palazzini, under the heading \u00abprofessor of philosophy of law\u00bb, but she was also a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life, a fact which the Commission had \u00abomitted\u00bb to mention.<\/p>\n In its complaint, the European Association for Free Thought argued that, when the group was reconstituted, the theological criterion should be removed, as this had the de facto effect of creating an over-representation of the religious community within the group.<\/strong><\/p>\n Ultimately, the theology criterion was removed by the European Commission when the group was renewed (2015) and lay candidates were invited to apply. A new balance was achieved in 2017<\/p>\n The AEPL has helped to organise conferences at the European Commission and the European Parliament Women in today's Europe (2010); Combating poverty and social exclusion (2011); Re-enchanting a people's Europe (2013); The EU-US Free Trade Agreement (2015); A different take on Europe (2019); Europe - a land of humanism - Combating extremism (2020).<\/strong><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A think tank that takes action and achieves results Concrete action for the future of Europe AEPL has distributed to the Parliament and the Commission a major summary document setting out our vision of Europe, entitled \"For a Europe...<\/p>","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":234,"parent":94,"menu_order":4,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-155","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=155"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/155\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/94"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/234"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aepl.eu\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}Gaining respect for secular values<\/h3>\n
Taking action through direct democracy<\/h3>\n
Successful referral to the European Ombudsman<\/h3>\n
Participation in conferences organised by European institutions<\/h3>\n